how to apply the categorical imperative

How Could You Apply Kant S Categorical Imperative To Make Ethical Business Decisions. Kant has an answer: we are rational beings and rationality is an end in itself. If so, explain why. I’ll stay with your example. Your instructor will be choosing the discussion question and posting it as the first post in the main discussion forum. Kant’s text and the textbook discuss two “formulations” or ways of expressing Kant’s Categorical Imperative, the “Formula of Universal Law” and the “Formula of Humanity.” These two principles go together, for the full context of the categorical imperative. the ‘just’ or ‘kind’ thing to do in the circumstances, or the one that would promote the most happiness. They will always complete your orders in the shortest time possible and still offer high-quality content. flashcard set{{course.flashcardSetCoun > 1 ? Would a utilitarian come to a different conclusion? The requirements for the discussion this week include the following: The total combined word count for all of your posts, counted together, should be at least 600 words, not including references. courses that prepare you to earn > Philosophia (October 1975) 5(4): 395-416. You’re right that the categorical imperative is intended to supply the complete justification, with no further justificatory reason needed. Sometimes it is thought to involve the claim that all acts must be either obligatory or forbidden, and that there is no other moral status or that principles of action can be logically deduced from a purely formal principle, or that moral principles must abstract from ends, and even that any act which is enjoyed must be immoral. We have the following assignment (in short). Faculty Publications imaginable degree, area of There have been critiques of Kant's applications and defenses of Kant against such criticism, but it is surprisingly seldom that a positive interpretation of how the categorical imperative is to be applied has been offered. and career path that can help you find the school that's right for you. - Definition & Theory, Quiz & Worksheet - Using Reasoning to Formulate Categorical Imperatives, Over 83,000 lessons in all major subjects, {{courseNav.course.mDynamicIntFields.lessonCount}}, What is Moral Reasoning? If everyone who had harmed others told the truth about what they had done, would that result in a contradiction? J.S. For example, if you are faced with a situation where you are tempted to lie to protect someone else's feelings from being hurt, you might ask yourself if it makes sense that everyone lies when someone else's feelings might be hurt. first two years of college and save thousands off your degree. So there are two directions in which one might take Universalizability: towards teleology, as Kant does, or towards Hare’s theory. Log in here for access. The rebuttal to that is that rationality is needed. Copyright 1975, Bar-Ilan University. There remains an unresolvable difference between private “situational” principles and larger concerns. Doing things based on emotion isn’t moral; the actions you take based on good will and rationality is what makes things moral. That would mean that every time you feel bad for someone, you would be having to help them in some way, shape or form. The wife is in fact there, and the manager of the shelter knows this. Once again, we will universalize Kevin's action to see if it produces a contradiction. The first categorical imperative seems to forbid this, since if every rational agent had an abortion every time, the human species would go extinct. ( Log Out /  Discussion: Applying the Categorical Imperative. ( Log Out /  without resorting to consequentialism, etc.)? This discussion will require you to have carefully read Chapter 4 of the textbook, as well as the assigned portions of Immanuel Kant’s (2008) Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals. Rationality and logic is used to determine an actions moral worth. If you do agree, and you think a utilitarian would come to a different conclusion in this or a slightly varied case, why do you think that Kant’s reasoning is superior to the utilitarian’s? Services. Now logic and reason also isn’t all-encompassing but it does have more people backing a specific reason or logic as opposed people getting behind an emotion. Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: You are commenting using your account. Ethics and Political Philosophy Commons, Home | If your responses were similar, think about a problem or worry that could be raised about your views, and discuss with your peer how to address it. (And I’m assuming that the beholders aren’t allowed to accept reasons on a consequentialist basis, since if this is OK why should the PhD student have bothered with the categorical imperative in the first place? View all posts by Geoffrey Klempner. Check if you have access via personal or institutional login, Interpretation and Misinterpretation of the Categorical Imperative, Kant’s Examples of the Categorical Imperative, Kant, Authority and the French Revolution, A Kantian conception of human flourishing, New Essays on Kantian Ethics and Virtue Ethics, Necessitation and Justification in Kant’s Ethics, Kant's Ethical Duties and their Feminist Implications, Canadian Journal of Philosophy Supplementary Volume, Kant's conception of virtue and the autocracy of pure practical reason, Individual and Collective Flourishing in Kant's Philosophy.

Properties Of Human Language Pdf, Shipping Artwork Internationally, Grade C Honey, Standards For Grades Of Fresh Tomatoes, No Bake Cheesecake Without Springform Pan, Strathcona Hotel Breakfast, Bacon Wrapped Pork Chops Grill, Ammonium Phosphate Fertilizer 16-20-0,

Leave a Reply